Deciding whether someone who remixes a song
is an innovator or pirate is a difficult one, in my opinion they are both. I am
a fan of that sort of music, taking the essence of one song and changing it
slightly or adding a dance beat to it is something that I would describe as
innovation. When dj’s play older rock songs with a dance beat to it, the crowd
for the most part, enjoy it, remixes of songs such us ‘Smells like teen spirit’
or ‘Seven Nation Army’ to name a couple are popular songs that have been
changed slightly to fit into the club scene. These are clever innovations but
in a sense, they have stolen the essence of a song and changed it ever so
slightly. Unless the artist who did the remix has paid for the sample or has
been given permission to use it, they have pirated the song. I don’t think the
artists these days would mind so much considering how easy it is to obtain free
music off the Internet these days. Although I do think that it should be in the
remix artist’s best interest to legally obtain the music sample from the
original artist. Having said that, I am yet to see mash-up artists or dj’s put
these remixes up for sale, these artists do not claim that these songs are
theirs, they simply just play the music. If one was to take a well known song,
change it ever so slightly and then attempt to re-sell it, then there is a big
issue. But the way that it is currently being done, I see it as an acceptable
practice, yes there is piracy involved, but artists these days make their money
from tours and promotions rather than a bulk of it coming from a sale of their
music. If anything the innovation of a remix could publicise their songs again.
No comments:
Post a Comment